For tax attorneys

Test a ruling against your fact pattern.

Read what the IRS concluded, on which page and on what record, before a ruling reaches your memo.

IRS Private Letter Ruling 202627005Released July 2, 2026 · Page 4

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. 2

Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that X has satisfied the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 with respect to the QSub elections for Sub 1, Sub 2, Sub 3, Sub 4, Sub 5, and Sub 9. 1

Private letter ruling · Non-precedential

  1. 1 · Facts it relied onThe conclusion opens “Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made.” Set your client’s facts beside the ones the request represented.
  2. 2 · Standard applied§§ 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 are the standards for more time to make an election. Read them in their official text.
  3. LimitNon-precedential. The ruling resolves this taxpayer’s request, not yours.
Illustrative example. Page 4 of the public ruling, cropped to the passage. Text elsewhere on the page is not shown.

How the work goes

From a fact pattern to a memo.

Four moves from a client’s facts to a memo you can defend, each with the source in view.

  1. [01] Facts

    Start from your client’s facts.

    Describe the fact pattern the way you would brief a colleague. The facts you give shape what the research looks for.
  2. [02] Rulings

    Find the rulings closest to them.

    Rulings that bear on the question come forward with their status; the ones that turn on a different election are set aside.
  3. [03] Law and conclusion

    Read the law and the conclusion together.

    Open the page that states the standard beside the page that applies it, each passage marked where the IRS wrote it.
  4. [04] Memo

    Draft with every citation in place.

    Accept a research addition into your memo and it brings its citation and its authority label with it.

Three things to test before you lean on it.

  1. 01

    The facts

    The conclusion opens “Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made.” Read the request’s facts against yours before treating the result as a match.

  2. 02

    The standard

    The ruling applies §§ 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3. Follow the reference to the official text when the rule itself matters.

  3. 03

    The limit

    A private letter ruling is nonprecedential. That label stays with the source as your research record grows.

Try it

Question the ruling yourself.

Ask the ruling what a careful reader would, and open the passage behind each answer.

PLR 202627005Illustrative · a scripted example

Choose one to see it play.

Illustrative example

From a sentence to its page.

In an answer, each sentence carries a citation. Hover, focus or press it to read the cited passage with the ruling’s publisher, release date and nonprecedential label, then open the original.

The IRS concluded that the taxpayer met the requirements for more time under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 to make QSub elections it had missed for six subsidiaries.

VirtusSample workspace · illustrative data
A research answer with numbered citations, and beside it the cited ruling opened at its page with its status and the original PDF.
The same step in the sample workspace: a citation opened beside the answer, with the source’s page, status and original PDF in view.

Read next.

Bring a fact pattern.

See a question, its cited answer and the ruling page together.